Skip to main content
Back to Rebuttal Desk
WhataboutismDemocracyElectionsEconomyhardkamala-would-have-been-worse

If Kamala would have gotten in it would have been much worse! We dodged a bullet!

What You Say

That line is projection dressed up as prophecy. It invents a catastrophic Harris future so you don't have to defend the documented Trump present. Harris ran on extending ACA premium tax credits, expanding drug-price negotiation, protecting reproductive rights as healthcare, and building on the Inflation Reduction Act's clean-energy jobs. Those are boring, measurable platform planks Tax Foundation, KFF, and campaign policy books already scored. What you actually got instead is Project 2025-aligned governance: Schedule F civil-service purges, DOGE-style outsourcing of agency power to unelected allies, tariff taxes paid by American importers and households, reproductive-rights rollbacks, and open contempt for the 2020 election and January 6 accountability. CBO and Tax Foundation model tariffs as a tax on U.S. buyers, not a magic China invoice. Brennan Center and court records document the election-denial and Jan 6 record. The gaslight is calling a normal Democratic platform 'destroying America' while treating Schedule F, rights rollbacks, and consumer-paid tariffs as patriotic. 'Much worse' is not evidence. It is a coping slogan for people who cannot look at Federal Register actions, GAO warnings, and price tags and still pretend hypothetical Kamala is the emergency.

The Stab

You are not dodging a bullet. You are eating the tariff, the purge, and the rights rollback, then blaming a woman who never got the keys for the mess you voted for.

Sources